Bad Reporting in Progress - Or How MS Didn't Invent the iPodFollow me dear reader and watch how bad reporting
happens.
Five days ago, Appleinsider.com
reported that Apple was not granted a patent on part of the iPod user
interface because they did not apply for the patent until 5 months after they
shipped the iPod and in the meantime, some dork at Microsoft ran to the Patent
office and tried to patent the technology Apple was already
shipping.
Source:
Wizbang!
« Troops Getting Upgraded Armor | Main | Just what does President Bush owe Cindy Sheehan? » August 14, 2005 Bad Reporting in Progress - Or How MS Didn't Invent the iPod Follow me dear reader and watch how bad reporting happens. Five days ago, Appleinsider.com reported that Apple was not granted a patent on part of the iPod user interface because they did not apply for the patent until 5 months after they shipped the iPod and in the meantime, some dork at Microsoft ran to the Patent office and tried to patent the technology Apple was already shipping. Now there are a few things to remember before we begin... Not the least of which is that Appleinsider is a rumor site. While I'm sure these guys do their best to get their facts right, it is a rumor site... Everything is, by definition, subject to change without notice. The next nugget that will be helpful later is that Apple can still appeal. (You might read the original article, it will help) So what happens when a rumor site puts up a rumor like that? Bad Reporting. Did Microsoft Invent The iPod? 8/12/2005 If you think Apple Computer's Steve Jobs invented the technology behind the Apple iPod, don't bet your 60GB, 15,000-song model on it. According to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, patent applications that cover much of the technology associated with the iPod were submitted by Microsoft, which has been on a patents tear recently filing thousands of patents. If the patents hold up on appeal, Apple could be accountable for royalties on the spectacularly successful iPod. Jobs and others associated with Apple filed for patents covering the technology in October, 2002, but that application was rejected by the patent office last month. AppleInsider.com reported the rejection this week. So we went from a rumor that a patent was rejected to Microsoft inventing the iPod and Apple having to pay royalties on it. My how the story grew huh? But that's just techweb, certainly nobody in the MSM would make that leap right? - um wrong. Katherine Griffiths writing for The Independent: Apple blunder gives Gates iPod royalty Apple Computer may be forced to pay royalties to Microsoft for every iPod it sells after it emerged that Bill Gates's software giant beat Steve Jobs' firm in the race to file a crucial patent on technology used in the popular portable music players. The total bill could run into hundreds of millions of dollars. Although Apple introduced the iPod in November 2001, it did not file a provisional patent application until July 2002, and a full application was filed only in October that year. In the meantime, Microsoft submitted an application in May 2002 to patent some key elements of music players, including song menu software. So now the rumor on Appleinsider has been reported as fact and upgraded to a "blunder" worth "hundreds of millions of dollars." That was fast. She acknowledges that she too got the story from Appleinsider which had none of those details. Clearly she invented the number. But there's even more problems in her story.... Closer inspection says the Microsoft patent was rejected. It was modified in December of 2003 but Techweb INCORRECTLY says the patent was approved. It is still an application. [uspto.gov] In reality it will not be approved because of this little thing called Prior Art. As you might have guessed, you can't patent something someone else is already shipping. Further in the US we use a "First to Invent" method rather than a "First to File." Clearly since the Apple product was ~you know~ shipping, they invented it before Microsoft and clearly the MS application was not novel. So why did Apple wait so long for the patent application? Probably because it just was not important. (and you aspiring inventors should know this) Once you ship (or publish info about) an invention you lose the right to patent it. Apple will lose on appeal and frankly, I'm not even sure why they bothered, probably only because Microsoft filed. But I'm digressing into patent law and this is about bad reporting. So watch in the next few days how this story grows... The whole thing is poor analysis of a rumor that even if true is meaningless... But that won't stop the media from getting the whole story wrong. Footnote: I've said both Apple and Microsoft will eventually have thier applications rejected AND if the USPTO has any credibility left that will be the case. (for the reasons stated above) Having said that, judging the PTO is worse than guessing the outcome of the Supreme Court... I gave up making predictions after they granted a patent for a stick! Posted by Paul at 01:48 AM | Link | Filed under: Dumbasses, Media, Tech Stuff | Link Cosmos | Trackbacks (1) larry borsato linked with The broken patent system. Comments: It shoudl be noted that the hook Apple was hanging this patent on is really uncontested in teh real world. They were teh first, as far as I have EVER been able to see, to create a menu system that organized music based on including or excluding certain factors. Basically we're talking about the smart playlist feature. I'm pretty sure almost everything else was in one player or somftware package or another, but that was a truly unique piece of work Apple did and it changed *everything* IMHO. Yes, they bought SoundJam and made in into iTunes, but once it came in house...they really turned it into something unique because of smart playlists. And aren't we supposed to grant patents to unique creations? I think they should appeal and they should be granted the patent they're looking fro in this case. Posted by: JimK at August 14, 2005 03:14 AM Wow, I should really spellcheck my comments. Posted by: JimK at August 14, 2005 03:17 AM (assuming it was novel et al..) Jim it WAS patentable- before they released details about it. Read this, (it's short) especially part 1 C. Posted by: Paul at August 14, 2005 03:23 AM Somebody is in denial Posted by: Patrick at August 14, 2005 04:51 AM I believe, the disclosure aspect only applies to the person who may have had valid patent claim and then revealed it themselves. Even so, there appears to be a 12 month window in which applications were made. Posted by: John at August 14, 2005 08:49 AM This is NOT a comment, just has THAT was not a pipe. Posted by: Magritte at August 14, 2005 09:12 AM Even if MS was awarded a patent, Apple could show that it was awarded in error and have the MS patent revoked, although that's a high hill to climb. Frank Posted by: Frank Laughter at August 14, 2005 09:13 AM Great article! I've been mumbling for two days about what a joke those articles were. Very refreshing to read some common sense. How about doing the same thing on the "Mac OS X cracked - runs on any PC" articles? Posted by: John at August 14, 2005 10:08 AM "So why did Apple wait so long for the patent application? Probably because it just was not important. (and you aspiring inventors should know this) Once you ship (or publish info about) an invention you lose the right to patent it. Apple will lose on appeal and frankly, I'm not even sure why they bothered, probably only because Microsoft filed." Actually, the U.S. is one of the rare countries in the world to give inventors a one year grace period to file for patent applications following disclosure or sale of their invention. Posted by: Doug at August 14, 2005 10:27 AM Actually the US is one of the rare countries who tried to give the genuine inventor the patent and not the first person to reach the patent office. Although its incredibly hard to prove. Another problem with the patent office is that in general they give out patents too easily now to any applicant. Then they let anything in dispute be shot out in the court room. Posted by: John at August 14, 2005 10:51 AM It is true that the US allows 12 months to file a patent after public disclosure. However, when were the iPod's smart playlists first disclosed? If my memory is correct, the first iPod of late 2001 did not yet have smart playlists. Posted by: Mark Johnson at August 14, 2005 01:52 PM Patent and copyright law is utterly out of control today. It no longer serves the public interest. Moreover, it impedes the natural progression of ideas that build upon the prior works of others, since nobody lives in a vacuum. Today, patents and copyrights are used mainly to stifle competition, or to live fat off one moment of brilliance or luck. Apparently the government is unable to balance the needs of business with the needs of the people, much less temper man’s insatiable greed for money. Thus the laws need to be abolished, but for those which protect against outright counterfeiting (which is really more like fraud). BTW, that was a good one — patent for a stick. I rest my case. Posted by: AW at August 14, 2005 02:32 PM First off, this Wizbang article points the finger at the wrong people. AppleInsider published an article on FACTS...i.e., that Apple failed to patent to the interface. The USPTO patent application was denied in mid-July and AppleInsider was the first publication to report on it. It was not a rumor and the substance of the story was mostly correct. Some of the implications may were drawn by the author, but the story itself was about the patent rejection and the Microsoft patents. Now the other articles are just poor reporting. The subsequent articles mentioned above, were follow-up and written by authors who cover technology, not law/patents. So they (had to) draw more conclusion, because the story was actually "broken" by AppleInsider: to make it "interesting" the story had to have a spin, and they just drew too many (far-fetched) implications. So I'm not sure why/if AppleInsider is getting the short end of the stick here. It's mostly these other authors/publications who tried to "expand" , re-report the story with a spin. So my question is why does Wizbang point the finger at AppleInsider. Posted by: bad reporting at August 14, 2005 07:39 PM >So my question is why does Wizbang point the finger at AppleInsider. Did you read the article? I did no such thing. Appleinsider was fine... It was what happened afterward that is bad reporting. Look appleinsider is a rumor site. There is zero, nada, nothing wrong with that. But from a whisper on a rumor site to the MSM claiming hundreds of millions of dollars in liabilities is just moronic. Did you read the whole thing or just the first 3 lines and go postal? I made it abundantly clear the bad reporting happened AS A RESULT of appleinsider's initial story. (you know- AFTERappleinsider) Posted by: Paul at August 14, 2005 08:16 PM Wow, a moment of clarity. I hope everyone else comes to their senses, too. So many people are just itching for Apple to fall that they'll say anything to make it seem inevitable. What's the Apple Death Knell Counter up to these days, anyway? Posted by: Leland at August 14, 2005 09:35 PM Post a comment Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? YesNo Subscribe to this comment thread: Subscribe To This Thread Without Commenting (Enter E-Mail Address) Main Home Credits Contact About Comment/Trackback Policy Your link preference: links open in this window Special Projects Support Wizbang Donate Wizbang Sponsors Wizbang! Premium Get this spot! Wizbang! Ads McCain for President? Do you agree? Vote in NewsMax's Urgent Poll! Click here now! Read More... Annoy a Liberal! Peace Through Superior Firepower Read More... Advertise on Wizbang! Online Stores Daily Tabloid News Word of The Day Car Titles Fax Machines Typewriters Office Copiers Sports Tickets Cash Registers SEO Services Wizbang Text Ads Advertise here Your link here Powered by AdBrite Buy A Link Now Recently On Wizbang Taking War Off The Table? Carnival of the Trackbacks XXIV Throwing the book at perverts Christopher Walken In 2008? Throwing good money after bad Despite String Of Positive Developments People Still Think Economy Sucks Rescued from the attic Cindy Sheehan Meets President Bush Media Whores Online BUSH'S MOTORCADE DRIVES PAST PROTESTERS! www.sorryfromnewhampshire.com Rob Port- You've Got Mail What Are You Lookin' At, Sweetie? Reckless Youth NARAL Pulls Ad Search Search this site: Technorati search this blog all blogs Search with Google Wizbang Ecosystem Links D.C. Metro Blog Map Archives Syndication RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0 RSS 2.0 (Full Feed) RSS 2.0 (Full Feed + Comments) Atom Feed Wizbang PDA Version Subscription Services Sites Where We Contribute SportsBlog WizbangTech BlogCritics The Command Post Blogroll Blogroll Wizbang! Fresh Sites ( *** Updated within the last hour) Dean's World*** Trader Mike*** Jennifer's History And Stuff*** pesky'apostrophe*** mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta)*** Bad Example*** This Blog Is Full Of Crap*** The Spoons Experience*** Captain's Quarters*** Power Line*** dustbury.com*** ScrappleFace*** Petrified Truth*** Silent Running A Small Victory PoliBlog Alphecca Better Living Through Blogging Arguing with signposts... Outside The Beltway InstaPundit Solonor's Ink Well Daily Pundit Right Wing News Am I A Pundit Now? Rocket Jones damnum absque injuria All Day Permanent Red ProfessorBainbridge.com Michelle Malkin The Washington Monthly small dead animals The American Mind The Indepundit (Citizen Smash) The Volokh Conspiracy Tony Pierce The Moderate Voice cut on the bias suburban blight The World Wide Rant swirlspice Viking Pundit OxBlog IMAO The Bitch Girls DANEgerus Weblog Spot On The Smallest Minority HobbsOnline Fanblogs.com View The Full Blogroll Reciprocal Links Blogroll Wizbang! A Fearful Symmetry A N O M A L Y A Nickel's Worth of Free Advice A Single Guy in the South a small victory AAFFLLAACCKK Aaron Meck Aaron's Rantblog Absinthe & Cookies Ace of Trump Acorns from an Okie All Day Permanent Red All Facts and Opinions Allah Is In The House Alphecca Am I A Pundit Now? Ambient Irony American Federalist Journal Amy Ridenour's National Center Blog An Unsealed Room annika's journal Another Rovian Conspiracy Apropos of Something Are You Hep To The Jive? Army of Mom Atheist Pundit Attaboy augustus Auterrific avoiding the Tar baby a_sdf Babalu Blog Backcountry Conservative Bad State of Gruntledness baldilocks Benedict besmirched Better Living Through Blogging! BIRD Bittersweet Me BizzyBlog.com Blog Beach Blog o'RAM blogoSFERICS Bowulf Boyd's blog Bozzy's World Brain Fertilizer Broken Masterpieces Business|Casual Captain's Quarters*** Catablast! Communications caughtintheXfire Chaos Magnet Chrenkoff Citizen Smash - The Indepundit Classical Values coffee achiever Commonwealth Conservative Conservative Outpost Conservative Rebel Conservative Thinking Curt's Weblog CynicalCyn.com d-42.com (Josh Cohen) damnum absque injuria DANEgerus Weblog Danz Family Dar al Harb Dean's World*** DeCloah Blog Demoncratic Blunderground Descent Into Madness Dewayne Mikkelson Diggers Realm Dilby News Monitor - FOXKNEWS DiVERSiONZ Dizzy Girl Dog Snot Diaries dong resin's joint DramaQueen drowning at 2 feet sea level Drunken Blogger Drunken Stepfather (NSFW) Dynamist Blog EarthlyPassions Electric Venom Emuse Espresso Sarcasm eTALKINGHEAD.com EtherHouse Evicting Mt. Olympus Evilwhiteguy's Blog Experences of a Army Geek exvigilare Feisty Republican Whore feministe femme grrl's useless ramblings Freedom Lives Fringe From Behind the Wall of Sleep Funkalicious funmurphys.com: The Blog gangstories Ghost of a flea gigglechick.com Gnome-girl go fish Graham Lester Granny Rant H Squared hard times Have you met Tony? Hot Abercrombie Chick HundredPercenterNews IbeJO Idlewild-South IMAO Impractical Penumbra In Search of Utopia INCITE Incommunicado InstaPundit InstaPuppy Insults Unpunished Intergalactic Capitalist Interrobang?! InTheBullpen.com Ipse Dixit IRAQ THE MODEL Iron Monkey is tomorrow just a day... It's A New Life Jaboobie and Two Hard Boiled Eggs JackLewis.net jargonese Jeff Doolittle dot com Jen Speaks Jennifer's History And Stuff*** John P. Hoke's Asylum John's Jottings JoniElectric.com Jumping To Conclusions Just A Girl In The World KateSpot KevinDonahue.com*** Kin's Kouch King of Fools Knight Of The Mind La Shawn Barber's Corner Late Night Ramblings Life by Velvet Life Trek Light Within*** Like Wow Dude! little green footballs lost thoughts masie pulls it off MediaReview MegaPundit MENORAH MensNewsDaily.com Meryl Yourish Michael Williams Michelle Malkin Mindful Daze Modulator MOLOTOV COCKTAIL FRANK Mookie Riffic Move the Crowd moxie MrsSatan MsCapriKell - It's Her Words... mtpolitics.net must be nice My Messy Mind my so-called blog my wild ride mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta)*** Nakedvillainy.com New Media Awards 2004 newsfeedonline.com nikita demosthenes Not a Fish (provincially speaking) Not Exactly Rocket Science Not Quite Tea and Crumpets Notorious B.L.O.G. Oliver Willis On the Fritz On The Third Hand One Little Victory orange haired boy Oscar Jr. Was Here Outside The Beltway Paige's Page Patrick Ruffini Patterico's Pontifications Peaktalk - Politics and Markets Pennywit.Com Peppermint Patty Perpetual Notions Phileos PhillipCoons.com phpMP pickle juice piquant PoliBlog Politickal Primal Purge ProfessorBainbridge.com protein wisdom Queen Goddess Speaks Questions and Observations Blog Rachel Lucas Rambling Webgirl Ramblings' Journal RandomActOfKindness Read My Lips Red State Rant resurrectionsong Right On! Blog Rightwingsparkle Rocket Jones SageOne Sandhill Trek Sanity's Edge Say Anything Say What? Scared Monkeys Serenity's journal sgt hook Sha Ka Ree She Who Will Be Obeyed!*** Side Salad Silflay Hraka Silflay Hraka: The Warren Simon World Sketches of Strain Sleaze Report Ruminations Slowplay.com Slumbering Pierrot small dead animals Sneakeasy's Joint Somewhere on A1A... Somewhere over the Rainbough Southern Musings SpankysPlace Speed of Thought... Spiced Sass SportsBlog Stop the ACLU stu's rants suburban blight SwimFinsSF swirlspice taco flavored kisses Technicalities Technically Speaking Tempus Fugit TexasBestGrok The Accidental Jedi The American Mind The Argus The Bejus Pundit The Bitch Girls The Blog Hunter The Buzz Blog The Calico Cat The Colorado Compound The Dax Files The Education Wonks the evangelical outpost The Fat Guy The Friendly Ghost The Galvin Opinion The Greatest Jeneration The Hedgehog Report The Last Call The LLama Butchers The Lopsided Poopdeck The New Editor The Noble Pundit The Pink Flamingo Bar & Grill The Psychotic Rant The Q Speaks The Realm of Chadness The Resplendent Mango The Right Journal The Short Strange Trip The SmarterCop The Southern California Law Blog The Spoons Experience*** The View From The Nest The Wise Man Says The World Around You thebandwagon This Blog Is Full Of Crap*** Thoughts Online Tiger: Raggin' & Rantin' Tobacco Road Fogey Too Much To Dream Treason Online Truth, Lies & Common Sense Truthful News University Blog UnPundit Uptown Girl Viking Pundit WallPoster Watcher of Weasels Wave Maker WesRoth.com What Would George Say! whatever you think... White family white pebble Who Tends the Fires Wicked Velvet wild-heart.net WILLisms.com Wince and Nod Wizbang*** Words From The Super-Villian write and left Wrong Side of Happiness WTF Is It Now?? WunderKraut.com www [dot] margilowry [dot] com You Big Mouth, You! Zero Base Thinking Zudfunck's BloG ~Jewels~of~the~Jungle~ ~whatever you think...~ Logo Grab the Wizbang logos Credits Editor-In-Chief/Publisher: Kevin Aylward Contributing Editor: Jay Tea Contributing Editor: Paul Software: Movable Type 3.17 Hosting Hosting Matters Design The Web Jones Additional Designs: The King Of Fools All original content copyright © 2003-2005 by Wizbang. All rights reserved. DCMA Compliance Notice " target="NewWindow">Read More... Posted: Mon - August 15, 2005 at 09:20 AM |